World human population:
Babies need loving homes.
Please adopt. World Chimpanzee population:
Year 2004: ~ 150,000
Present: Probably less! World Gorilla population: ~ 700! | Recent posts- Paranormal update ~ http://glo…
2010, September 2 - Spark of Divinity ~ http://hig…
2010, September 2 - @WhereIsPaulJr http://twitpic….
2010, September 2 - Paranormal update
2010, September 2 - Obtained Bonded NdFeB’s
2010, September 1 - Hue MCU efficiency meter update 5
2010, September 1 - Paranormal
2010, September 1 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - Free Tibet
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tor…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31
| The recent link between the diode and crystal battery research is huge. Instead of having trillions of microscopic diodes fabricated on a chip, a much better method is to use a Electret with ultra high Pr, electric remanent polarization. This means that anyone will be able to make such a device, by mixing the correct materials, melting it, applying the polarizing DC electric field, wait, and cool. Once cooled, wait ~ three weeks for the material to become undisturbed. That’s it, you have a device that provides endless usable amounts of power. It appears all of the research is now becoming clear on a theoretical level. The research claims the key ingredient in the diode is the built in voltage due to the contact of two dissimilar materials. The research claims the key ingredient in the crystal batteries is the polarized molecules, an Electret. The difference being, that it requires highly specialized equipment to create microscopic diodes, but anyone can make a Electret battery. IMO the main doubting issue in the crystal batteries was if it’s due to electrochemical reactions. The diode research has solved that since there are no measurable electrochemical reactions in diodes. Furthermore, that theory has been heavily tested. Diodes with larger contact area actually produce less stabilized DC power. Also, tests have shown that the diode would not accept a charged. Even Alkaline batteries accept a charge. Diodes do not. Then came the piezo, a pure polarized crystal that has no electrochemical reactions, that produced thousands of times more DC power than the best LED’s. The electrochemical theory is dead. Given all of the present data that I’m aware of, it appears the major key is in finding materials with the highest Pr, remanent polarization. And to make an Electret battery last longer we want material with high Ec, coercivity. Higher Ec means that it will take ambient thermal energy longer to destroy the polarized electric field built into the material. This is akin to ambient thermal energy slowly demagnetizing a permanent magnet. All things decay over time, including NdFeB magnets. It might take thousands of years for ambient thermal energy to demagnetize the NdFeB magnet, but it will occur. Even subatomic particles eventually decay, as they have a life span. Materials with sufficient Ec will provide an Electret battery that will last a lifetime or longer. How can you help? To start, please visit the threads at overunity.com forum on Crystal batteries, Marcus Reid, John Hutchison. Here’s a link to one of such threads, Crystal Power CeLL by John Hutchison. There you can find various people who have worked on such batteries. With enough help we can find the materials to build an Electret battery capable of producing a lot of DC power. We need people with perseverance, the new Thomas Edison’s, to start mixing and making such batteries! A lot of the batteries I read about in such forum threads are fully capable of lighting up an efficient LED.
The Radio Shack 273-073 piezo is doing better than anticipated. For what seems to be about an hour or two the DC current has jumped to 20′s pA range. Note, this piezo can produce a lot more DC current, in the hundreds of pA. Such tests are on a disturbed element that has been producing DC power for days. As stated in the previous blog post, yesterday the Radio Shack piezo, part number 273-073, was shorted the entire day across the Keithley meter while measuring the DC current. BTW, the piezo was already appreciably disturbed prior to yesterdays measurements. Initially the piezo produced a relatively large amount of DC current, but within hours decayed to about 10 pA where it stay for a good part of the day, and then quickly dropped well below 1 pA. Today, the 273-073 piezo started off with about 14 pA, and has been slowly oscillating between that and 0.7 pA. It could be getting ready to jump to a lower energy level. Interestingly enough, the 10 pA has made itself known to the piezo’s as well! What is with 10 pA? Is it some Universal constant, perhaps an unknown Universal flow? I think the 10 pA represents the stabilized constant current, and will probably not be used on commercial batteries. Both the diodes and piezo’s have shown that they produce hundreds to thousands and possibly more times more DC current when recovered. So it makes sense to never allow the components to get down to the 10 pA level. Such components should go through a cycle of load/unload. The the current reaches a certain point, it would be best to unload the component to allow it to recover. IMO, the idea of placing components in paralleling and in series will not be necessary in the end for a retail product. Simply one large component should work. What the data seems to show is that regardless of how large the component is, or how many are in parallel or in series, it will eventually reach the 10 pA level, but that does not mean that larger units will not produce more *initial* current than a smaller unit. Don’t get me wrong, placing diodes in-series was vitally important, as it brought the DC voltage levels high enough for instruments to easily detect the DC voltage to prove the concept. I’m getting enthusiastic to receive my fancy MCU board, which is loaded with goodies such as 3-axis accelerometers –> http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8298 This board has built in SD card, which will allow for long term data logging, pretty much as long as needed. Then we’ll start seeing some data logging. The crystal elements (piezo’s and such) will be inside the first metal shield, going to the small electrometer chip, which will probably go to an optocoupler. The output wires of the optocoupler will go through a small pin hole in the shield, which will go to the data logger. The data logger will be inside the second metal shield.
The following is part of an email sent to someone who’s researched and built Crystal batteries. Note, diodes are also made with Crystals. Example, monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon. Months ago the diode research crossed paths with the Crystal battery (for lack of better term right now) research. Present research is now on piezo’s, and will probably switch to Electrets. We’ll have to see if the crystal state is the key, and/or if it’s due to the high built in electric field. In diodes, the built in field is typically 15 V/um, which comes to 12 V/um * 2 um = 24 V, where 2 um is the depletion width. For piezo’s it’s typically 0.25 V/um, which comes to 250 V for a 1 mm thick piezo. That is not to say such a diode with 2 um depletion width will produce 24 volts, but it’s a relative rating. That maximum DC voltage produced by a single diode was 1/3 of a volt, while the maximum DC voltage produced by a piezo was 3 volts. Thanks in advance for asking Reid if he would want to exchange information. I could offer a lot of advice that might lead to greatly improving the DC power of the device. Also, I respect that you do not tell certain information that would jeopardize anything. My only goal is to get this technology in public hands, which of course will have to eventually include selling such batteries when the research is over, but since crystal batteries (for lack of a better term right now) will probably be the largest industry in all history and therefore plenty of room for a lot of competing companies. Hopefully Reid could respect a friendly business partner between him and myself working together (one day) as respectable generous business people while still competing. Reid has offered a lot of public information, and I’ve offered everything so far. You say that increasing the electrode surface area can increase output a little bit. If I understand you correctly, you’re also saying that increasing the volume of the crystal battery can also increase the DC power output a little bit. The diodes might have the same effect, but first we need to define some definitions –> Undisturbed: I use the word “undisturbed” a lot in the diode research. It is the diode that has been resting inside sufficient shielding for awhile and connected to nothing, where three weeks is often the prescribed time. Stabilized current: The DC stabilized DC current produced by the component. The stabilized current, so far, has been around 10 pA. Size does not seem to change the stabilized current. It’s still unknown if the stabilized current can be sustained indefinitely. Initial current: When the undisturbed diode is immediately connected to a load, the DC current is high compared to its stabilized current. It seems the stabilized current is around 10 pA, but then after a while it can drop (or sometimes jumps to a lower energy level). That’s right, it seems there are energy levels evolved. These energy levels might be in Reid’s batteries, but the incremental steps might be so small that he’s not seeing them. It appears that while the diode rests unloaded, energy is being built up. When the diode is loaded, it releases the energy. So far in three years the diodes have always recovered. Reid’s graphs also seem to suggest that the DC current in his batteries will continue to do the same thing, that is slowly decay over time while loaded, and then recover when unloaded. I would even bet that if his batteries were loaded long enough without recovery time, that the DC current would hit this 10 pA level. Although given the volume of his batteries it might take decades for this to happen. I still don’t know if the 10 pA could be sustained forever, or if it drops below 10 pA simply because the voltage meter is slightly disturbing it. So far, it’s always dropped below 10 pA, but it seems to fight this as it remains at 10 pA for a while. The diode size does not seem to make any noticeable different in the stabilize DC current, which always seems to be 10 pA. Although, I suspect that size makes a difference in the peak DC current. An undisturbed diode might produce 1 nA at first, and a similar diode with larger contact area might produce 10 nA. The above observations and a lot of others show great similarities between diodes and the Crystal batteries. I don’t think the DC voltage is due to Johnson noise rectification, but another effect that I explain on my blog site. This new theory makes some big predictions, and we’ll see if they are true. If true, then it would lead to batteries far better than anything Reid & Hutchison have built. We’re working with piezo’s, which are producing DC currents far higher than any diode so far. According to theory, Electrets with high E-field should produce more DC power than piezo’s. I too am working with some scientists, some with PhD’s. A EE, by profession, while working my diode research accidentally discovered that the piezo produces a DC voltage, which is why my research has switched over to piezo’s instead, and might soon switch over to Electrets. The EE placed the piezo in good shielding, and it continues to produce DC power. I have confirmed that piezo’s produce DC power, and have also seen my piezo recover. Last night I took a *disturbed* piezo, which at first produced a few dozen *nano* amps, but at the end of the day while connected to a short it fell to 30 *pico* amps, stayed for a while, and next time I came back it fell to 10 pA, and stayed there for the entire night, and then suddenly drop. Soon I’ll be getting my data logger, so this data was not logged, but it’s possible that it could have dropped from 30 pA to 20 pA, and then to the 10 pA. Is there some quantum level effect involved here? Soon I’ll be getting an Electret component. So that will be interesting to see how well it performs, but there’s no data on it’s electric field. So it could be a cheap Electrets with a low E-field. Have you seen youtube videos how to make Electrets? It’s very easy. Quote from wikipedia, “One of the earliest recipes consists of 45% carnauba wax, 45% white rosin, and 10% white beeswax, melted, mixed together, and left to cool in a static electric field of several kilovolts/cm.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electret#Manufacture The guy making Electrets on youtube does not seem to make it in the traditional way. I’ll have to find out, but it seems the material is supposed to be melted while applying the electric field, which is probably why it takes him several weeks to make one. Please let me know if you find a place to buy material that has exceptionally high permanent electric field, or the most powerful know Electret. There are so many needed experiments to once and for all solve some questions. Can a larger crystal diode produce more DC power? In short, it appears that the “stabilized current” is the same for all of these batteries/diode-arrays, but the initial current varies with size. If true, then in the end, a battery twice the volume could produce twice as much power. |
As publicly stated in the past, when my diode research is complete, and proven to produce DC power when highly shield, then and only then will I begin thinking about starting a company to sell such devices. This does not violate my public statement, as the statement has always clearly stated that it is regarding my research. It’s already safe to say that the diode has proven time after time to produce DC power when highly shielded, even within a cave far out in a rural area while inside two layers of metal shielding. So far various scientists have indeed confirmed my research, that the diode produces DC power inside metal shielding using an electrometer. The scientists I am referring to are scientists by profession. In fact, it was a professional EE that discovered that the piezo produces DC power while he was working on my diode research. This does *not* mean I will now start a company to sell such batteries, as the research is *not* complete. The power levels are still far to low. One could only guesstimate when the research will reach a point where the devices produce enough to market, but my best guesstimate is that in 1/2 to 1 year from today the power levels could reach 100 mW. For the moment, such devices could light an LED for awhile, followed by a recover period, and repeated endlessly, or at least present data shows that the devices will always recover. Theoretically, a device that continually lights the LED would be made of multiple units that take turns producing the power. Presently there are two methods of lighting the LED. One is by allowing an undisturbed LED array to charge a low leakage capacitor, and then discharging that across an efficient LED. A better method is to connect an undisturbed piezo element to an LED. For the moment, the amount of light produced is exceptionally low, so the person should be inside a dark room. As always, such experiments have been conducted in highly shielded environments. As to where *most* of the energy comes from is still unknown, although I have a theory & hypothesis. The diode most likely rectifies Johnson noise, but due to the extremely low bandwidth of most diodes at so-called thermal equilibrium the DC voltage from such rectification is most likely lower than we can detect. This is still unknown. It’s unknown if the energy is from ambient thermal energy, but it appears the main effect is *not* due to the rectification of Johnson noise. A new hypothesis, that is looking interesting so far, shows there is a continuous unknown flow of energy from the positively charged particle to the negative, that slowly builds up over time, that has a small effect on charged particles such as electrons. Such a flow of unknown energy might slowly dragging the electrons to produce current and potential. I was playing with a Piezo ignition today, and got hammered. Man those things hurt. It must have produced at least a few thousand volts. Piezo ignition can easily produce 12,000 volts. It’s amazing that a crystal can produce that much voltage. Afterwards I measured the DC voltage produce by the Piezo ignition while not in use, and it was producing 20 mV, and climbing. That must have greatly disturbed it. Here’s one of the first screen shots of EE-B4 data logging –> 
As you can see in this graph, his piezo is pumping out a lot of current then it’s now. In the above graph it’s nearly 400 pA. This is how the diodes behave as well, which is the DC current and voltage are high after the diode has rested/recovered. After awhile the component needs to recover.
Preface: EE-B4 is the name I gave one of the EE’s I’m working with on the diode research, which seems to have now changed to piezo research, which is essentially a crystal. Hmm, come to think of it, the Silicon in diodes is also a crystal! Either a-Si (monocrystalline Silicon), or p-Si (polycrystalline). I went to Radio Shack today, a retail store, and bought a Piezo element, part number 273-073. I took my AM-240, which was tested at having an input resistance of ~ 15 *giga* ohms in 400 mV mode. In ~~ one minute the DC voltage climbed to over 400 mV. So that was … wow, very interesting, LOL! Then, what the heck, I bumped the meter up to the next voltage mode, 4 volt mode, know that it would most likely shunt the piezo’s voltage since the input resistance in this mode was tested at 20 *mega* ohms. To no surprise, the DC voltage was indeed shunted. BTW, the DC voltage was negative as EE-B4 shows in the graphs. Okay, so that at least confirms EE-B4 was telling the truth! Trust is built with experiences.  Anyhow, for those who intend to replicate this expensive big $2 experiment,  , please note that you *must* have an ultra high input resistance voltage meter, or –> - Place ~ 1 uF low leakage capacitor across the Piezo element.
- Wait ~~ 5 minutes. I’m guessing here since I have not timed how long the 273-073 piezo would take to charge the 1 uF. Note, if you leave the capacitor on the piezo too long, then the DC voltage will most likely will drop at an equally fast rate because it appears that the piezo oscillates for a long time after it reaches peak until it settles down to … we don’t know yet.
- *Quickly* measure the DC voltage across the capacitor. If you meter is 20 Mohm Rin, then the meter will drop the capacitors voltage at a rate of ~ 20% per 4 seconds.
Anyhow, my recommendation is to not disturb the piezo, and just take the measurement because according to EE-B4′s data logging update, it appears that the piezo shows the same symptoms as diodes, the TED effect!  The 273-073 piezo has 30 nF according to my meter. One final comment, I did not place a 1 uF capacitor across the 273-073 piezo element. … There’s nothing like the proper equipment, and in this case it’s an ultra high input resistance meter.
The piezo news has changed the schedule/goals. Here’s the new one –> 1a. See if directly paralleling the piezo’s equates to more DC power. 1b. If 1a, above, results in less or same DC power by paralleling piezo’s, then place ~ 5 piezo’s in series, and then parallel a few of those such that no two piezo is in direct parallel connection. See if this indirect paralleling method produces more DC power & current. 2. If parallel = more DC power, then see if the same type of piezo, but smaller, equates to the same or perhaps more DC power. The diode experiments have shown that smaller diodes would equate to more DC power due to higher Rz. 3. If smaller piezo’s = same or more DC power, then calculate the size each piezo element would have to be in order to produce a usable amount of power, which would at least permanently light an efficient LED, 200 nA * 1.3 V = 260 nW. Get a cost estimate to have such a piezo/crystal chip built. 4. Search for better materials, perhaps trying the ones Marcus Reid used, or the materials John Hutchison used, or something we think might work even better. Personally I would tend to believe that paralleling the piezo elements would result in more DC power because it appears the piezo is not limited to the 10 pA DC current. This might be due to the fact that the piezo is not a single diode, but might consist of countless individual microscopic diodes. The piezo element is made by mixing elements, heating while applying sufficient DC current, and cooling. That’s the exact process I’ve outlined in making a diode battery.
Here’s an email recently sent to one of the EE’s Hey, you were right about how piezo’s are made –> http://www.americanpiezo.com/piezo_theory/index.html There’s probably a lot of types of materials used, different types of crystal material, but this says perovskite crystals, which according to wikipedia is, “calcium titanium oxide mineral species composed of calcium titanate, with the chemical formula CaTiO3.” CaTiO3 is *Ferroelectric*. Now lets take a look at one of Marcus Reid batteries –> http://www.keelynet.com/energycrystal.jpg It’s has PbTiO3, which is a *Ferroelectric*. Also this Reid battery has SrTiO3, which is also a Ferroelectric. Here’s a nice page on Marcus Reid batteries –> http://www.rexresearch.com/reid/reid.htm Hopefully Reid has not given up on his batteries because I know how negative people can be, ripping people a part over time. Personally I’ll *never* give up, but I don’t know if Reid has any strong support to overcome the guys who say it’s just electrochemical reactions. For example, I have three years of support from diodes where I have ran extensive tests to see if the DC voltage produced by diodes is due to electrochemical, and the results are “no” it is not due to electrochemical reactions. It seems Ferroelectrics is the key to the Reid batteries. Perhaps the Ferroelectric significantly changes the noise *distribution,* which would greatly increase the effectiveness of the ambient thermal energy. IMO, the crystals and diodes produce the DC power from the same source. For now I’m tend to believe the source is ambient thermal energy, but who knows, maybe it’s ZPE, or neutrinos, or dark matter/energy, or an completely unknown source. It’s interesting how the piezo is made from the Ferroelectric material. It’s the exact method I’ve hypothesized years ago in making what I called a “Diode battery,” which is basically mixing P and N type materials (could be semiconductors to even insulators), heating, applying an intense electric field, cooling. The electric field aligns the PN junctions for a net alignment. The heat allows the PN junctions to rotate. If you ask me, Bernat, this will be the discovery of all discoveries, greater than the discover of electricity and the light bulb. Geez, if true, then this would even allow for personal jet backs powered by endless energy into high performance electric motors. The electric motor technology has long been there to do this. There are small compact light electric motors that can put out well over 40 HP. They’re getting amazing. A show a few years ago showed a relatively small electric motor that put out over 100 HP. Even 40 HP is enough to kill a person with high G forces. Small turbines has been around long time. Can you imagine putting on a backpack and jumping into the sky to see your grandchildren in the next state. How cool is that! Or take an adventure by souring through the Yosemite National Forrest, or the Grand Canyons! Ummm, that’s if such forests survive global warming and pollution.  [Sentence erased]. Well, this technology would easily allow people to move to Mars, or even our Moon. The positive possibilities are endless. |
EE-B4 has informed me that he shorted the Piezo again. So we will never know what it was going to do after that ~ 3 volt peak, but he’s letting it run again, and hopefully we’ll know what it does on the second run. Here’s the email I sent EE-B4 –> Opps, you shorted it already? Then we won’t know what it was going to do. Oh well, if you short it, and then let it go back up, then the prediction is that the new peak will go below the previous one, which was ~ 3 volts. That’s what the diodes do. They peak, and if discharged, they peak again, but usually less. And the more power they produce, the more they drain. And when unloaded, they recover again. Marcus did that with his crystal batteries for several years, and as far as I know is still doing it. He says that after they rest, they’re as good as new. No problem. We’ll get a new peak, and then we’ll see if it oscillates near that peak and begins to slowly decay, or if it peaks and then immediately decays. What would be real cool is if it peaks at the same ~ 3 volts *again*, but I don’t expect that. Can you let it go this time without discharge? Lets see what it does *far* after the peak. I’ve been working with various scientists, EE’s and physicists on the diode research. Most of the scientists that have degrees from Universities are highly skeptical, and will remain anonymous, for now. Recently, a EE I’ve been working with that I’ll refer to as EE-B4 has discovered that Piezo’s also produce DC current and voltage. He’s measured a DC voltage on diodes, but what’s more interesting to me is the Piezo discovery. The following is one of the graphs he mailed me, which he gave permission to publish –> 
This graph is of a Piezo, part number 7BB-20-6L0, made by Murata, connected to a 10 nF capacitor. Also, this Piezo has 10 nF at 1 KHz, and most likely far more capacitance at DC. So the DC capacitance is at least 20 nF, and most likely far higher. The X coordinate in the graph is time in seconds. The Y coordinate is voltage. Nobody really knows what the Piezo will do next. I’ve never experimented with Piezo’s, so I cannot make any claims. IMO, the Piezo will either begin to oscillate near 3 volts, or it will begin to immediately take a dive. My best guess is it will oscillate near 3 volts, and then begin to *slowly* decay. That would match the diode data. If true, then once it decays to a sufficiently low point, it’s best to let the element recover by removing the load or capacitor. Once the element has recovered, the load or capacitor can be placed back on the element. The SMS7630 diodes have repeated this process for over 1.5 years, and showed no signs of a gradual decline. Marcus Reid claims his crystal batteries (Piezo elements are usually made of crystal) have produced DC power for two years, which slowly decays (sound familiar?). Marcus Reid says the crystal battery restores when disconnecting the load and letting it recover. I don’t know. All I can say is that so far the Piezo is behaving like a diode, where the DC voltage rises to a high, and then begins to slowly decay. What seems interesting is that this Piezo seems to put up with more disturbance than any diode I’ve analyzed. No diode I’m aware of would let me data log continuously like that because it would become disturbed. EE-B4 said he’s data logging every second. Lets hope Piezo’s, which are usually crystals, are better than diodes. BTW, Theory two does indeed predict that Piezo’s would produce DC current and voltage, as it states that any two dissimilar materials in contact form a depletion width, which BTW is what conventional physics claims.
June 2, 2009 — Fox News – Los Angeles, USA “Whale Wars”, the highest rated show on Animal Planet is returning for a second season. The show follows members of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society as they try to stop whaling ships from capturing and killing whales caught under the guise of research. Captain Paul Watson and Shannon Mann are interviewed by the hosts of Good Day LA about the upcoming season. Congrats Paul Watson! For ~ a month I began pondering about an idea, pretty obvious. According to my recent hypothesis, the DC voltage produced by the diode and also the piezo is due to an electric field. It’s theorized that under certain conditions an unknown flow of energy could slowly build up between the positive and negative charge, and tunnel back. This could produce a force on electrons. So the obvious idea is to charge to plates outside some material, place an electrical insulator to prevent electrical discharge. Then place two wires on the outside of the material. Given sufficient time (perhaps three weeks), a flow of energy would build up, which would tend to force electrons in one direction. This is a long shot idea, IMO, but if all else fails to find material (e.g., Electret) with sufficiently low resistivity, then it might be worth trying this experiment. I’ll be the first to admit that in a few years all of us diode researchers will look back and get a good laugh at these theories, as they are lacking detail. Although IMO, yesterday was a good day for theory. Nearly all of my time the past week has been spent on theory, and the peaces of the puzzle appear to be falling in place now. Theory two, “Peering into the Diode,” is making far more sense now, and the math is looking good so far, knock on wood. Theory two predicts that the DC voltage produced by the diode is due to a *change* in the diodes load resistance. More details will be posted, but for now the theory predicts that the low leakage charging capacitor should be placed before the mechanical switches such that the diodes are *not* connected to anything in between measurements. Actually, the mechanical switches in off position have resistance, but that should be far above 10 Tohms. The setup is: The low leakage 0.01 uF capacitor is across the electrometer, which is all separated from the diode array by two ultra high resistance mechanical switches that have at least 10 Tohms off resistance. This could be metal ball (solid metal, not liquid mercury) tilt switches, or Knife switches. Therefore, when the switches are in off position, the diodes are connected to *nothing*. When the switches are closed, the diode array begins to charge the 0.01 uF capacitor. If the diodes are fully undisturbed, then the charge rate is 1 mV per second. If the diodes are a bit disturbed, then it could be ~ 1/10th that at 1 mV per 10 seconds. Moderately disturbed diodes, ~ 1/100th that at 1 mV per 100 seconds, in which case leaving the diodes connected to the meter that long to see something might make the diodes highly disturbed. Highly disturbed diodes, forget about it, just place switches in off position, turn off electrometer, let diodes rest for one to three weeks. If you don’t have an electrometer, then contact me. For about $8 you can build your own with the amazing INA116PA chip. Mine was tested at producing only 2.2 fA (2.2E-15 amps) with over 2E+15 ohms input resistance. Has anyone been watching the TV series “Whale Wars”? I cannot believe japan still kills whales in the most disgusting tortures fashion. The show is on as I type this, and cannot watch most of this episode. If you are not watching this season of Whale Wars, more specifically todays episode, then you have no idea what these sick japanese people are doing, and most of japanese people support these war whaling ships. As I type, the guy in the seashepherd helicopter is describing the coverage of one of the japanese war ships desperately trying to catch the final two whales of a family. The war whaling murdering ships have killed the entire family with just two whales left. The helicopter guy just clocked the whales desperately swimming at 17 knots as the war ships are on their tale! 17 knots is incredible speed for these type of whales, and unfortunately the Whales are getting very tired he said. I just glanced at the TV to see the saddest sight ever, as these poor gentle giants are swimming so hard, as fast as they can to get away from the japanese war whaling ship. Why? Because these two remaining whales just witnessed their entire family get murdered one by one from the three sick japanese war ships! The helicopter guy just said the japanese war ship has one of the Whales in a bad position, and it doesn’t look good. … Well, … it’s over, … they just shot the massive harpoon into one of the final two whales. Now there’s just one Whale left in the entire family. These poor gentle giants do not die on the spot. It is a long and torturous death. They fight the massive steel barb lodged deep into their body as the war ship slowly drags the whale to the war ship. Then the poor whale, still alive, is dragged miles across the ocean to the mother ship, where it’s dragged onto the massive mother ship. From there the whale slowly drowns in his or her own blood as they cut into the gentle giant, a mammal, the largest known creature in all history, larger than any dinosaur. Their brain is the size of a car. Their heart is the size of a small car, which can be detected from two miles away. That day will be the last song that the beautiful family will ever sing in the great oceans. And for what? Because japanese people like the taste of whale blubber and meat! The end! How sad for japan to support this!!! Until they stop, I can *never* buy a japanese product again. Please don’t think you can’t help. Each person can make a difference. As much of a difference as you want. *Please* consider helping! For further details –> Save the Gentle Giants The diodes in-parallel has always been a nightmare for the research. To date, all in-parallel diode experiments show poor results. The in-series experiments were vitally important in proving that the diode produces DC current and voltage. So then what about diodes in-parallel. It’s probably far to premature to say anything yet, but the math is making an interesting prediction that as the number of diodes in direct parallel connection increases, there reaches a point where the DC power begins to increase. Given the massive in-parallel diode array, and I do mean massive, the DC power could begin to increase at a rate linear to the number of diodes in-parallel. The problem is, unless there’s a major breakthrough in this diode technology, it would require a diode array the size of a car to power a cell phone. Who knows, maybe a new technique will revive the diode in-parallel design. The above is the brute force method. A diode array in-series could potentially provide kilo watts of DC power from a hand held size wafer. The problem is, the impedance would be so high that it’s unusable.
In a recent blog I note that the mechanical Knife switch should be at least 10 Tohm, but that’s not to suggest it’s sufficient, mind you. I’m beginning to wonder just how high of resistance the undisturbed diode reaches. The depletion zone of a typical diode is comparable to glass, and recent experiments are showing that insulation resistance of insulators ***slowly*** increase over time. Quote from my blog –>
“Tom Bruhns found that in just 24 hours the insulation resistance was up to 7.2E+22 ohm! What’s interesting is that the predicted Johnson noise from 7.2E+22 ohm resistance is 91 *Million* volts rms! Initially one would ask why there are no sparks across the capacitor if the Johnson noise is 91 million volts. The answer is simple. The predicted noise current is far too low for detection being at 1.3 fA rms. There are no known instruments capable of detecting 1.3 fA noise from a 7.2E+22 ohm impedance source!” So from one minute to 24 hours a typical low leakage capacitor insulation resistance rises from ~ 100 Gohm to 7.2E+22 ohm and kept climbing. I believe that over a relatively long period of time highly shielded matter slowly enters into a new highly sensitive state that conventional science is unaware of. Even the slightest disturbance can destroy the state. There was a time when classical physics ruled the headlines, but starting in the early 1900′s experiment after experiment began to hit the headlines that classical physics could not explain. Classical physics fails in quantization of certain physical quantities, wave-particle duality, the uncertainty principle, and quantum entanglement. It took a long time for the majority of scientists to switch over. The old timers, classical physicists, fought hard, claiming that classical physics could explain it all. An interesting quote, “he was perhaps the last respectable member of the anti-quantum crowd, and passed away in 1937 still trying to develop a purely classical theory of the atom.” Classical physics has failed at just about everything related from low temperature experiments to photoelectric effects. Classical physics got it wrong for even blackbody radiation. Quote, “Classical physics failed to explain black body radiation.” –> http://www.answers.com/topic/modern-physics
BlackLight Power Inc. press releases People would benefit if they would allow history to sink in deep enough so it becomes part of daily life. When was the last huge upset in conventional science. Einsteins theory of Relativity did a number on conventional science. Quantum mechanics did a number on conventional science. There was a time when classical physics ruled the headlines, but experiment after experiment began to hit the headlines that classical physics could not explain. Conventional science theories will be hit hard over the next two years. I have over two solid years of extensive experiments that has proven the passive diode produces DC current and voltage. Time to begin rewriting those equations, again. … According to BlackLight Power Inc., the “Hydrino” is –> Hydrino: Hydrinos are a new form of hydrogen discovered by BLP. Hydrinos are produced during the BlackLight Process as energy is released from the hydrogen atom as the electron transitions to a lower-energy state resulting in a smaller radius hydrogen atom. I’m wondering if the process of creating the hydrino is the same process I discovered in setting the diode in the undisturbed state, which is basically letting the material set inside an appropriate metal shielded environment undisturbed for at least three weeks. A recent experiment indicates that matter changes at a slow rate when left completely undisturbed at so-called thermal equilibrium where insulators resistance *slowly* increases over time. One example is the Mercury tilt switch off resistance increasing from 0.44 Gohm to 24 Gohm in a matter of hours. A well respected EE, Tom Bruhns, performed insulation resistance tests on low leakage capacitors. The insulation resistance of such capacitors measured by the manufacturers are typically ~ 100 Gohm within the first minute. It is known that insulation resistance in capacitors increases over time. Tom Bruhns found that in just 24 hours the insulation resistance was up to 7.2E+22 ohm! What’s interesting is that the predicted Johnson noise from 7.2E+22 ohm resistance is 91 *Million* volts rms! Initially one would ask why there are no sparks across the capacitor if the Johnson noise is 91 million volts. The answer is simple. The predicted noise current is far too low for detection being at 1.3 fA rms. There are no known instruments capable of detecting 1.3 fA noise from a 7.2E+22 ohm impedance source! Does hydrogen show the same effect where by letting it rest inside sufficient metal shielding completely undisturbed for sufficient time will result in the “Hydrino?”
I found a new type of mechanical switch that might work well for the diode experiments, a Knife switch –> 
This particular switch is sold by Radio Shack, but is also sold by a store in UK. Although I have not tested this switch yet, it should have ultra high off resistance far above 10 Tohm. |
Loading ...
