World human population:
Babies need loving homes.
Please adopt. World Chimpanzee population:
Year 2004: ~ 150,000
Present: Probably less! World Gorilla population: ~ 700! | Recent posts- Paranormal update ~ http://glo…
2010, September 2 - Spark of Divinity ~ http://hig…
2010, September 2 - @WhereIsPaulJr http://twitpic….
2010, September 2 - Paranormal update
2010, September 2 - Obtained Bonded NdFeB’s
2010, September 1 - Hue MCU efficiency meter update 5
2010, September 1 - Paranormal
2010, September 1 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31 - Free Tibet
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tor…
2010, August 31 - I liked a YouTube video — Tib…
2010, August 31
|
I still haven’t started winding the toroid for the Hue device. I was caught up in Tom Bearden’s book, “Energy from the Vacuum.” It’s an oldie, but definite goodie. It’s just amazing how many devices Tom goes over in that book. It’s like the encyclopedia of excess energy machines. Yesterday I purchased two new web domains. Hey, they’re only $1 each. So I decided to give MediaWiki (the software that WikiPedia uses for their website) another chance, again. Sigh!! U N B E L I E V A B L E ! ! ! Understandably these programmers work on it for free, but OMG, they are still in the stone age! Don’t they know what a *GUI* is. Changing the settings to the thing is like going back to old DOS or command prompt Unix. To change the website logo you have to upload your image (by your means), then go on the server and edit a php file (by your own means), edit a variable that contains the path to your image! LMAO. OMG, if I was working on the MediaWiki project it would take me like 5 minutes to write the code to add a nice and simple admin page to allow people to click a button to pop up a explorer folder to click on the image, and click submit to upload the image where it would automatically update the website logo. It’s just a zillion things like that are missing. Then there are MediaWiki *extensions* that are basically plug-ins. There’s a “Configuration” extension, LOL. Wow, it actually has a web form text field to allow you to *type* in the URL to your logo. Why not spend a few more minutes to code in a File button, LOL. I’ve taken a look through all of the MediaWiki extensions. Sorry, but MediaWiki is still a joke. Going from WordPress to MediaWiki is like going from the modern hitech world to the stone age. MediaWiki does not even tell you if there’s a software update, right? I didn’t see any. I’ve dealt with MediaWiki years ago, and it didn’t have a software update then either. Get this, every admin page in WordPress will display a message at the top of the window if there’s a WordPress software update. And all you do is click on the button to *AUTOMATICALLY* update it. LOL. Same goes for the WordPress widgets. As far as I know, WordPress can do everything MediaWiki can do and a whole lot more. It just so happens WordPress is set up to look like a blog site, but it can be set up to look like a Wiki as well. Okay, that’s enough of sticky prickly MediaWiki. On my two new websites MediaWiki was wiped and replaced with WordPress. I was not going to replace WordPress with MediaWiki, heavens no, but was going to use both of them on the same website where WordPress was going to be in the /blog folder. BTW, there is another good Wiki out there called TikiWiki. It’s another open-source project, but I’ve dealt with those programmers ages ago. They just do not know much about performance software. TikiWiki was, and appears to still be a bloated monster. Although their website loaded today, yesterday it was so slow that it timed out. Geeee, now I wonder why. Well, unless you absolutely hate your webhost, and then by all means give TikiWiki a try. Just make sure you don’t plan on getting much web traffic, unless you want to flip for a rather expensive dedicated web server. Surely there must be a good Wiki out there. Perhaps PHPWiki. I looked at the top dozen Wiki’s, but they’re all small projects compared to MediaWiki. You can tell by their Alexa traffic rating. Then there content management system such as Joomla. Last time I tried it, a few years ago, it was okay at first, but became a literal nightmare. It’s simply a role of dice. There are so many forums stuffed with people crying for help to fix their Joomla bug. If one stays away from the plug-ins, or whatever they call them on Joomla, then it’s probably safe enough, maybe. Anyhow, maybe the new updated Joomla is a lot better. I don’t know how WordPress does it, but man, I’ve installed plug-ins up the yin yang, zillions of them, and have never had big issues. WordPress is amazing, period! So WordPress has version 3 out now, so I was playing with it on the two new website for the rest of the day. That’s about it. That’s pretty much my one day vacation away from excess energy.  Today, instead of winding the Hue core I’ve decided to rebuild the energy transfer circuit again using a custom made core in hopes of achieving over 95% efficiency. Actually the new Hue device will need two energy transfer circuits. So basically, instead of measuring the efficiency of the Hue device from now on, the device will recirculate the energy back into the original source. Well, at least that’s the plan. Therefore the only thing I need to do is monitor the voltage on the source, which will actually be a charged capacitor.
I just completed a new MP1903P4AS Metglas MAGAMP toroid core. It has a coating of cheap transparent epoxy except two sides are blank for the ferrite core. Then excess epoxy was filed down off of the toroid. Next the toroid needs to be wound. The new toroid will be used in the Hue device to see how it compares to the first toroid. The efficiency produced by the first toroid has slowly declined from ~ 120% to 101%. Hopefully the new toroid will start at least 120% efficiency, but old analysis of the Metglas MAGAMP toroids used in “Tiny Orbo Replication” indicates there’s a breaking in period.
The 100 uF electrolytic capacitor connected to 100 Mohm load that’s inside the freezer is still producing current. Yesterday it was producing 0.5 mV = 5 pA. That’s amazing since the temperature is around 3 F. The piezo element, PS1720P02, connected to 20 Mohm load was producing 0.1 mV = 5 pA.
The book “Energy from the Vacuum” by Tom Bearden is an oldie, but a goodie. What a wealth of information about the Floyd Sweet. Were you aware that Floyd Sweet had a Masters degree in Electrical Engineering from a leading University! He worked for General Electric for many years. Sweet was also a transformer designer. Floyd Sweet was also great in mathematics. 
What an amazing person, Floyd Sweet. Floyd was very clear that his VTA would literally form ice when the output was shorted. This happens due to humidity (H20 gas in air). Floyd was very clear that his device lost weight. In fact, Tom Bearden was on the telephone with Sweet as he increased the output power in steps of 100 watts up to 1000 watts where Tom Bearden wrote down the VTA weight loss as Sweet increased the output power. Here’s the graph –> 
Tom Bearden spent a lot of time with Floyd Sweet. In fact, Floyd gave Mr. Bearden one of the conditioned self-oscillating Barium ferrite magnets. Tom Bearder placed the shim-stock on the magnet, which resulted in the shim-stock fluttering. Tom saw this with his own eyes as the the shim-stock moved endless against wind resistance, which equates to power with no input– just a magnet and a piece of metal. Tom locked up the magnet with the moving shim-stock for 24 hours. When Tom opened the lock the next day, the shim-stock was still there on the magnet oscillating, having continously done work against the air resistance for 24 hours with no known energy input. 
Since this blog site is getting a lot of web traffic, could people please give me a heads up notice before slurping the website. Otherwise I could easily be seen as an attack on the server and blocked from the site. See my contact link in the sidebar or header to contact me. Also, please abide by the robots.txt file on this website, which requests one page every 10 seconds. The problem with a lot of website slurp software is that they could care a less about the robots.txt file and about the server, where they hammer the server in an attempt to download as many webpages in as short of time as possible.
In continuing from Floyd Sweet must read, there’s yet another correlation that I just recalled. Years ago someone who lives in France told me they were in direct contact with J. L. Naudin, where Naudin told him that his MEG did indeed self-run, but for only very short periods of times. He said that Naudin gave up because he could not get the MEG to self-run for very long. … Naudin used Ferrite magnets. Were they *Barium* or strontium ferrite magnets? I am telling you folks, there is some type of unknown exotic energy within all matter. IMO certain materials can store more of this energy than other materials. When the exotic energy is depleted (or expelled?) from the object, experiments indicate the energy is always naturally restored, but at a relatively slow rate. IMO people such as Floyd Sweet found a way to significantly decrease the recovery time. Exotic energy is not so far fetched. By means of Quantum Mechanics (QM), academic science community fully accepts *negative* energy. QM states that all space must be filled with a sea of energy. Some call it the Dirac sea. QM states that all space continuously at all times creates and destroys particles, and such particles are always created in pairs. One of the particle pairs is positive energy, while the other is negative energy. Together the energy is zero, and hence Zero Point Energy. Such particles are called Virtual particles. For the layman the concept of negative energy doesn’t seem real, but it is, and it can do real work; e.g., Hawking’s radiation. Academic scientists to this very day have debates about such exotic energy such as negative energy. I’ve seen far too many academic science forums to know better. People would be amazed how much academic scientists disagree, LOL. What is seen in TV science documentaries often gives a nice and pretty impression of academic science community. The mind of Stephan Hawking’s discovered what is well known as Hawking’s Radiation. Hawking’s Radiation is a stream of particles that all Black Holes are predicted to radiate. Since all space is a constant sea of virtual particles, including on the perimeter of a black hole, the negative energy particle flies inside the black hole, and the positive energy particle flies away from the black hole, hence the Hawking’s radiation. The negative energy particles eventually annihilate with the real matter in the black hole, which reduces the black hole weight, or so it is believed. As far as I know, this has not been verified yet. So, according to academic scientists, all around us and within us at all times space has infinite energy, virtual particles. Such virtual particles create all of the forces in nature; e.g., electric & magnetic, nuclear, weak. Academic science states that there is a cloud of such virtual particles around all real particles, where such virtual particles are constantly being created and destroyed, a sea of energy. Academic science states that if such a virtual particle survives long enough, then it becomes a *real* particle. Such a particle could have either negative or positive energy. Is it possible that certain atoms such as Barium under certain circumstances to create significantly more negative energy particles than other atoms? You better believe it! As far as I know, the properties of such negative energy matter is still unknown, but from what I gather it would be delicate matter. Perhaps a sudden surge of positive energy matter such as real electricity could cause an annihilation. Who knows at this points, but for years I’ve described countless experiments that clearly show how *undisturbed* diodes and piezos are exceptionally sensitive to sudden current surges and sudden changes in temperature, how easy it is to disturb such components. Once disturbed, the component does not produce any measurable power for a duration of time until the component has had time to recover. It’s getting exciting folks as humanity is on the brink of perhaps the greatest discovery of all time.
There is not just one type of Barium Ferrite magnets. There are a lot of different chemical recipes. One manufacturer’s recipe could be different from another manufacturer. WikiPedia does not have much info on Barium Ferrite magnets, but it does mention 4 different types: BaFe2O4, BaFe12O19, BaFe15O23, and BaFe18O27. There are a *lot* more types. Barium ferrite
Wow, take a look at this quote on Tom Bearden’s website –> Link: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/021502b.htm None of the inventors I know of who replicated it [Floyd Sweet VTA], ever achieved such a [high] COP. To my knowledge, the longest they achieved the activation was about 6 weeks. At least one did light a 100-watt bulb or so, but the output *decayed*. Often the activation (by the others) would last only a minute or two, then a few minutes as they got better at it, etc.
Can you believe that!?!!! Wow that is ***EXACTLY*** what I’ve been blogging about for a long time! I’m telling you folks, this should be evidence to help you believe certain excess energy claims are legit. I have my personal proof. I’ve seen the excess energy countless times. One of the first times for the Hue Device as during the 120% efficiency measurements where the *total* input and total output were taken, which was *DC*. There was no mistaken this. Extremely simple measurements. Over time there is a tendency for the efficiency to decrease, as is clearly seen in the efficiency results on this blog site. If I recall, the Hue device was last tested at ~ 101% efficiency. No, no, no, I did not give up on the Hue device, LOL. No way! It was only placed on pause, just as my diode & piezo research was put on pause last year, but I came back to it as always. And because I recently stumbled upon the Floyd Sweet technology from reading Tom Bearden’s book, I’m about to get back to the Hue device again.  Of course I’ll keep working on the diode / piezo / electret / crystal battery research. Slowly but surely we’ll achieve Global Free Energy. Just make sure you take rapid efficiency measurements. The fast the better. That’s the best way to know when an adjustment produces excess energy. 
It’s unfortunate that Floyd Sweet technology is not popular in the free energy community. Peswiki website has hardly nothing on Floyd Sweet stuff. Most of links on J.Naudin’s website are broken. IMO the Floyd Sweet device is legit, but he took the secrets to the grave. One thing that’s very interesting is Floyd Sweet said the secret is his *barium* ferrite magnets. Floyd also said the magnets must be *conditioned!* Barium was one of biggest secrets to the John Hutchison first crystal batteries because of it’s a key ingredient to extremely high ferroelectric properties in Barium titanate. Maybe there’s a connection. Also, Floyd Sweet said the barium ferrite magnets have to be conditioned. Nobody seems to know a lot of details about the late Floyd Sweet devices, but I’m wondering if this *conditioning* is a method of helping the magnets *recover* at a faster rate. One thing I noticed about my Hue device experiments is that the net efficiency decreased over time. In fact, one can go over my blogs to get the reported efficiency to see this. There were a few efficiency measurements that were not net efficiency. For example the 150% efficiency included all losses such as joule heating, so that’s in a different class. Also in my “Tiny Orbo Replication” blogs one can see notes that Metglas MAGAMP toroid slowly changed over time. In fact, the blogs clearly state that there is a breaking in period for these toroids. So to recap, there’s a good correlation between my Hue device, “Tiny Orbo Replications,” and also the piezo & diode research. For diodes & piezos I’ve referred to this as being undisturbed, where the component must be undisturbed before it produces the excess energy. In the Metglas MAGAMP cores there was noted a breaking in period. Also there’s indications that a loaded diode or piezo will only work for a certain period of time before it must be unloaded and left undisturbed for a period of time to recover. This effect is clearly seen in my Hue device where the efficiency slowly decreased over time, where it ended in 101% efficiency. Perhaps these cores need to recover. Maybe Floyd Sweet discovered a method of decreasing the recovery time. See the this web page on Tom Bearden’s website talks a bit about this conditioning process. Remember, measuring efficiency is the #1 recommended method in excess energy research! For Floyd Sweet experiments one should measure efficiency in addition to weight loss and temperature changes. See #1 research recommendation for details. 
Today I’m doing a little bit of research on Floyd Sweet, that Tom Bearden has named the VTA. IMO this device seems legit. Anyhow, in continuing from my previous blog, #1 Research Recommendation, of course one wants to measure efficiency, but when researching devices such as the Floyd Sweet VTA, one could also monitor the temperature of various locations on the device. Additionally, one could monitor the weight of the device. The are a lot of inexpensive sensitive scales for measuring the weight. It depends how much your device weighs. If it weighs less than 200 grams (7.05 ounces), then I would highly recommend the LanteScale, model number MH-200. I paid around $10 for it, bran new! LanteScale has various scales. For example the MH-600 weighs up to 600 grams. The MH-50 weighs up to 50 grams, and is extremely sensitive. 
This scale is extremely sensitive, and will tell you if the device has lost any weight. Of course, if your device produces any appreciable external magnetic fields, then you’ll want to place a tall block on the scale so as to separate the device from the scale. I use a block of Styrofoam because it’s light. All you would do is place the Styrofoam block on the scale, and then press the Tare button, which will zero out the scale. As for measuring temperature, you can get a tiny thermistor, which typically cost about $0.20. The smaller the thermistor is, the faster it will react to temperature changes. Also place a tiny dab of heat sink grease so the thermistor makes good thermal contact with the device. You would then connected a voltage meter to the thermistor. The more digits (counts) your voltage meter has, the better. I would recommend multimeters with at least 4000 counts, and up to 40,000 counts. The Uni-T UT71D multimeter has 40,000 counts, with temperature probe, and comes with a USB cable and software so you can data log, all selling for about $150. Or the UT70D multimeter with 80,000 counts and true RMS AC RS232 duty costing only $100. For example the UT70D could display 79.999 mV. That’s 1 micro volt resolution! Or if you really want to get tricky, then use an op-amp with a pot to zero it out so you can increase the gain to get more sensitivity.
I cannot say this enough. By far the #1 excess energy recommendation is –> QUICK EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENTS!!!!!!!
Seriously folks, this is by far the biggest problem in the free energy community. Regardless of how much hassle it is, it is so important. The reason measuring efficiency is vitally important in this field of research is that it is one of the best ways to know the moment your device is producing excess energy. Since there are a world of unknowns in this field of research, IMO one of the fastest ways to discover a setup that produces *stable* excess energy is to try as many different combinations throughout the day. IOW, you would adjust this, and that, etc. etc. In order to measure efficiency you obviously need to know the input and output. If the input is DC, then you can measure the current and voltage with two meters and use a calculator to multiply both to get the input power. If your output has AC, then you might need an oscilloscope. Some people use a power meter, but one must know that such meters have a bandwidth limitation. If your output is say 60 Hz *square wave*, then there are frequencies above 60 Hz. Ideally one would want live efficiency measurements so they can do as many tweaks as possible. [edit: Also see Other research recommendations]
I have not taken measurements lately because I’m doing a lot of research on building a battery. All is good over here, as things are getting exciting!
I would encourage *EVERYONE* to conduct excess energy battery experiments. What is great about this research is that anyone can make such batteries. You don’t need fancy equipment like an oscilloscope. And I’m telling you that at most it will be a few more years before this technology starts powering devices, and even homes and cars. Don’t be put off by the pico amp experiments. The purpose of such experiments is to focus on an individual unit in order to focus on the effect in order to solve the in-parallel issue. Experiments have shown that size does not matter. The individual units could be microscopic. When we solve the in-parallel issue, then it’s only a matter of mixing a powder with a bonding agent, heated up, and placed within an intense electric field to polarize the microscopic ferroelectric particles, and allowed to cool down. After a few weeks of allowing it settle down, it’s ready for use. That will *literally* create quadrillions of individual units per 10cm x 10cm x 10cm (10cm = 3.9 inches) cube, thus producing tens of thousands of watts.
Yet another experiment was added yesterday. On 2010/7/15, 13:50, a 100 uF electrolytic capacitor connected to a 100 Mohm resistor was placed inside a thick small plastic container, which was wrapped inside a very thick sock with two wires connected across the capacitor extending slightly out of the sock. At 14:26 yesterday it was placed inside the freezer. This morning, 2010/7/16, 07:14, at 6.1 F, it was producing 1.4 mV = 14 pA. The setup in the refrigerator is all over the place probably because the refrigerator is being used a lot lately. I’ll probably end that experiment until it’s placed inside sufficient shielding. Today on 2010/7/16, 07:25, 73.9 F, the 3 x 100 uF, 11 Mohm, was producing 0.2 mV = 18 pA.
The following graph shows how the electrolytic capacitors current varies with temperature. At normal room temperatures it appears the majority of the DC current is due to electrochemical reactions due to the electrolyte. This will vary from capacitor to capacitor. The graph contains two different capacitors. As you can see the upper graph in violet is rather linear, probably because it’s considerably higher than the lower graph, but the lower graph appears somewhat non-linear as it approaches lower levels of current. It appears as though the electrolytic capacitor in the lower graph is leveling off because the electrochemical reactions are becoming less significant near 70 F. The electrolytic capacitor in the upper part of the graph appears to have more electrochemical reactions, but would become insignificant in the 60 F region. That makes sense since the electrolytic capacitor in the lower graph was connected to a load far longer than the electrolytic capacitor in the upper graph. Initially some might think the upper graph electrolytic capacitor is producing more current because its load has less resistance. I don’t think that’s the reason because numerous other setups use the same capacitors with as low as 1 Mohm, but they were producing around 20 pA. The reason they’re producing less current is probably because they used up the electrochemical reactions faster because of less load resistance. Of course, all of the electrolytic capacitors produced a lot more current initially, in the nano and micro amps, but such energy was quickly burnt up. 
I added two more experiments. 1) A piezo element. 2) An electrolytic capacitor freezer experiment. The rest of the electrolytic capacitor measurements are similar to yesterdays measurements. 2010/7/14 11:31, 1 x 0.47 uF #1, 22 Mohm, 74.4 F, 1.1 to 1.2 mV = 50 to 55 pA, ceramic magnet 13:42, 1 x 0.47 uF #2, 22 Mohm, placed component inside freezer 15:31, piezo element PS1720P02, wire wrapped to a 20 Mohm resistor, taped up piezo element hole. 16:00, piezo element PS1720P02, added 4.7 uF Mylar capacitor. 2010/7/15 05:41, piezo element PS1720P02, 0.2 mV = 10 pA 05:43, 1 x 100 uF, 132 Mohm, 38.4 F, 0.6 mV = 4.5 pA, refrigerator setup 07:38, 1 x 0.47 uF #1, 22 Mohm, 74.3 F, 1.1 to 1.2 mV = 50 to 55 pA, on top of ceramic magnets
This is very interesting that the piezo element settled at … 10 pA. Amazing! It’s not a carefully done experiment like a lot of my previous piezo experiments in that the present piezo is not inside any shielding at all, which is why I connected a 4.7 uF Mylar capacitor across the piezo. When my hand gets near the piezo, the voltage quickly changes, but the 4.7 uF capacitor will resist such a change, thus providing enough time to measure the piezo voltage. This method could quickly disturb the piezo element. The purpose of this method is to see how fast an unshielded piezo element becomes disturbed. The electrolytic capacitor experiments so far indicate that all *room* temperature measurements are *dominated* by electrochemical reactions. There still isn’t enough data to say for certain, but the reason I started doing the refrigerator experiments is to decrease the electrochemical reaction rate. Years ago I did some refrigerator & freezer experiments on diodes, which showed interesting results. As was seen in other measurements, the electrolytic capacitor current increases significantly even with a small increase in temperature. Although so far when placed in a refrigerator the current is fluctuating around 4.5 to 15 pA. If we look at the data in the graphs, the DC current should have hit zero amps far above refrigerator temperature. We’ll have to see how the electrolytic capacitors do in the freezer. So far it appears that when an undisturbed electrolytic capacitor temperature is low enough, it will produce the mysterious ~ 10 pA DC current.
Another great day for electrolytic capacitor measurements. Here’s the data. 2010/7/13, 13:42, 1 x 100 uF, 132 Mohm, 39.2 F, 0.0 mV, refrigerator setup 2010/7/13, 14:40, 1 x 0.47 uF #1 setup, 22 Mohm, 73.7 F, 1.1 mV = 50 pA, before placing on ceramic magnets 2010/7/13, 15:02, 1 x 0.47 uF #1 setup, 22 Mohm, placed on top of ceramic magnets 2010/7/13, 15:23, 1 x 0.47 uF #2 setup, 22 Mohm, 74.6 F, 0.7 mV = 32 pA
2010/7/13, 15:26, 1 x 0.47 uF #1 setup, 22 Mohm, 75.5 F, 1.2 mV = 55 pA, ceramic magnet experiment 2010/7/13, 21:45 , 1 x 0.47 uF #1 setup, 22 Mohm, 74.5 F, 1.1 to 1.2 mV = 50 to 55 pA, ceramic magnet experiment 2010/7/14, 08:17, 3 x 100 uF, 11 Mohm, 73.5 F, 1.0 mV = 91 pA 2010/7/14, 08:19, 1 x 100 uF, 132 Mohm, 35.0 F, 0.6 mV = 4.5 pA
The refrigerator setup seems to be fluctuating around 10 pA. I’m hoping it stays around there. Yesterday it was at 15 pA. Today it’s 4.5 pA. The setup on top of the ceramic magnets increased from 50 to 55 pA, but so far is going back down. Although a lot more data is needed to say for certain what effect the magnets have on it. So far it appears that magnets cause a *momentary* increase. The 1 x 0.47 uF across 22 Mohm #2 setup is a bit low, but I accidentally shorted it.
Someone has been emailing about some interesting electrolytic capacitor experiments. He’s placed magnets around an electrolytic capacitor. He believes the data logging graph shows an increase in *DC* voltage, but when I look at the graph I only see a momentary pulse / hump in the graph, not DC. It’s difficult to tell because his capacitor voltage fluctuates so much. So I thought to replicate his experiment in hopes of getting some clearer data. To do this I’m using a capacitor with much less capacitance to help eliminate a lot of the fluctuations. One issue I have with his experiment is that he’s using rubber bands to hold the magnets, which is applying force on the capacitor. The change in force on the capacitor could effect the voltage that the capacitor produces. So I decided to simply place the capacitor on top of the magnets. This is still flawed because there’s some steel inside the capacitor. Also the leads are made of steel. So there’s a little bit of pressure on the capacitor.
People have asked how the diode, piezo, electret, and electrolytic capacitor experiments could help the small guy because they can’t make a diode array made of trillions of nanoscopic diodes. Ah, but you can!!! That is exactly what John Hutchison and Marcus Reid have been doing. Every time you mix two ingredients together, you automatically make countless diode junctions. Albeit they are all pointing in random directions, but when the material is heated up and an electric field is applied, then slowly over time they begin to align. After it cools down they retain such alignment. Same goes for ferroelectric materials. And hence, that is how anyone can make such a battery. So indeed, anyone will be able to make such an excess energy device. And in fact, I’m betting it will be easier to make than just about any “free energy” machine. This will be the time of the new Thomas Edisons! Where people around the world will be mixing chemicals together to discover the right ingredients, and the right temperature, duration, and electric field. You’ll see, these new excess energy batteries are already starting to produce usable amounts of energy as seen from John Hutchison’s new batteries. And from what I’ve seen, John is not even close to using the correct type of ingredients. Just wait till then!
Some great / interesting news for the electrolytic capacitor experiments. The refrigerated electrolytic capacitor has been producing a positive voltage since late yesterday. This morning it was producing even more positive voltage. Also the DC voltage produced by the 3 x 100 uF with 11 Mohm load is still slowly dropping, which is good news in that it’s predicted by the theory. Don’t get me wrong, again I’m not saying it’s impossible to get more DC current and power from paralleling such passive components, but when they’re simply connected to each other like that they produce the same DC current, at least so far. Although, the theory does predicts a method of getting past this in-parallel limitation, but it could be awhile before I can test it. Also, there’s always the in-series method, which appears to produce more DC voltage and power, but that’s impractical. Here’s the data. 2010/7/12, 18:15, 35.0 F, 1 x 100 uF, 132 Mohm, 1.4 mV = 11 pA
2010/7/13, 07:35, 38.8 F, 1 x 100 uF, 132 Mohm, 2.0 mV = 15 pA 2010/7/13, 07:32, 71.0 F, 3 x 100 uF, 11 Mohm, 0.9 mV = 82 pA |
Loading ...
